Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 21 - 40 of 950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 2:02 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Extended probation Appellant, Spencer Roland Hill Jr., appeals from a grant, by the Circuit Court for Charles County (Bragunier, J.), of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:09 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Denigration of defense counsel’s role Harvey Cordell Spencer appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County of theft under $1,000, and resisting arrest. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:28 pm
The Supreme Court's revision of general pleading standards in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:18 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 11 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc [2014] UKSC 11 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
The post Spencer v Taylor – section 21 news appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:47 am
The England and Wales Court of Appeal has confirmed an earlier European Court of Justice ruling in holding that Marks Spencer could offset losses from its overseas subsidiaries against its U.K. income (EHalsey v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The post Spencer v Taylor- Some Analysis appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am by Warren Gordon, Olswang LLP
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:47 am by emp
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) came out with R v. [read post]