Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 81 - 100 of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 11:23 am by David
Spencer Lo  There is no question that, in the ordinary sense of the word, a great many non-human animals are slaves, forced to exist in extremely deleterious conditions to fulfill the wishes of their human masters. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:05 am
R v Rahman and others (Appellants) (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) [2008] UKHL 45 (2 July 2008) Spencer-Franks (Appellant) v Kellogg Brown and Root Limited and others (Respondents) (Scotland) [2008] UKHL 46 (2 July 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/fJ3MzJ9… http://t.co/aS2INXOvuO -> Supreme Court releases reasons in R. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/fJ3MzJ9… http://t.co/aS2INXOvuO -> Supreme Court releases reasons in R. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:04 am by Venkat Balasubramani
She heard about a planned protest of businesses housed in a building owned by Sherry Spencer, the mother of Richard Spencer. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:40 am by sally
‘The case of R (On the Application Of Geller & Anor) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 45 was an application to the Court of Appeal against a refusal by the Upper Tribunal to grant permission for judicial review by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, the founders ‘Stop Islamization of America’, referred to by the Secretary of State as an anti-Muslim hate group. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:05 pm
Herbert Spencer, call your office." *** The quip refers to the Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Philip Marsden, The British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Spencer Weber Waller, Loyola University of Chicago, School of Law - Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies, and Philipp Fabbio, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria - School of Law have posted... [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:30 am by tracey
Spencer Smith v Ashwell Maintenance Limited (Leicester County Court, 21/1/2019) – claimant who was found to have exaggerated and overstated his difficulties not fundamentally dishonest on the basis that his motive was to convince rather than to deceive. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
Here is an abstract: In 1972, the United States Supreme Court in Spencer v. [read post]