Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 101 - 120 of 941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 4:55 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday, a panel of the 9th Circuit issued an amended opinion and denied an en banc rehearing in Spencer v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:42 am by David Fraser
However, in light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of R. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am by David Fraser
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 11:17 pm by Richard M. Re
Spencer, a 3-2 en banc First Circuit decision by Judge Torruella on whether a prisoner has an Eighth Amendment right to sex reassignment surgery. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Spencer (4th Dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction and vacated a Superior Court Information (SCI) where the defendant pled guilty pursuant to a SCI after he was indicted for a crime arising from the same incident. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Mark Lewis
This is a case that, in my opinion, is crying out for a sub nom and I’m going to use the Slaw platform to try and start a groundswell of support for R v Spencer to be more commonly known as: IP Freely. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:43 am by Huw Morris
At the end of last month, the long-awaited judgment in the Interflora v Marks and Spencer case on trade mark infringement as it relates to keyword advertising was delivered by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:53 am by SHG
The First Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
I'm learning more and more about the details of Hawaii criminal law.Before this opinion, I wouldn't have thought that a conviction in Hawaii for "criminal property damage in the first degree" was anything near as dangerous as "burglary of a dwelling, arson or extortion" or a crime that "involves the use of explosives." [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am by Giles Peaker
(Our thanks to Spencer Turner for this guest post) Brent Council v Shah and Others, unreported 29 January 2018 (Crown Ct (Harrow)) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been successfully used by Brent Council against landlords for breach of licencing conditions. [read post]