Search for: "Spencer v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
’ News Corp boss Rupert Murdoch married Jerry Hall on Friday at Spencer House in London. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
King County, 15-584, include petitioners familiar to readers of our last Christmas spectacular, Robert Spencer and Pam Geller (no relation to Josie “Grossie” Geller). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
These reasons ought not to be read as endorsing the Judge’s remarks relating to “initial interest confusion” or as endorsing every alternate basis on which the Judge dismissed the action".In the UK metatags have been discussed, although not in many cases, most recently in Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc, where the High Court (after a CJEU referral) deemed the use of a competitor's trademarks as metatags would infringe their rights in those… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
Herbert Spencer's Social Statics . . . . a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72  (Case Comment here). [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:06 pm by Patricia Salkin
Amendola v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Haven, 2015 WL 8134019 (CT App. 12/15/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]