Search for: "Spencer v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Spencer L. Reames
  The Court stated that it has been the “noted policy of the courts to sustain the validity of subscription agreements whenever a counter promise of the donee can be sustained from the actions of the parties or it can be demonstrated that any legal detriment has been sustained by the promise in reliance upon the promised gift. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am by Ritika Singh
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
[xxv] See Spencer, Arbitration, Class Waivers, and Statutory Rights, at1012 (citing Kaltwasser v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 19 February the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria; Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc; and EM (Eritrea) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]