Search for: "Spiller v. United States"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 2:28 am
Supreme Court Chaytor & Ors, R v (Rev 2) [2010] UKSC 52 (01 December 2010) Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53 (01 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullings v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2820 (01 December 2010) Webster v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2819 (01 December 2010) SB, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2620 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) International Management Group (UK) Ltd v German & Anor… [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Feldman argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance with Howard M. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Medtronic v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:32 pm
Many of these cases ultimately rely on the statement in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:32 pm
Many of these cases ultimately rely on the statement in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Notes that European Union and United States officials will kick off talks in Washington on 9 Dec 2010 on a personal data protection agreement when cooperating to fight terrorism or crime. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Latest Cases Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53, 1 Dec 2010. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
The Public and the Courts , Greg Caldeira Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States 35. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
Although the European Court of Human Rights has held that the rule does not in itself violate Article 10 (Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) v United Kingdom (Apps Nos 3002/03 and 23676/03) [2009] EMLR 254), it is clear that it can have an onerous impact upon newspapers and other online publishers. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Moreover, there appears to be no need for the defendant to prove, as the Supreme Court had required in Spiller v Joseph [2010] UKSC 53, that the comment explicitly or implicitly indicates, at least in general terms, the facts on which it is based. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
There is extensive caselaw on this issue, culminating in the Supreme Court case of Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53 which is likely to be extremely persuasive if not technically binding. [read post]
