Search for: "Spillers v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
On Monday 26 July and Tuesday 27 July 2010, the UK Supreme Court will hear the appeal in the “fair comment” case of Spiller v Joseph. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in the case of Joseph v Spiller ([2010] UKSC 53), the first time it has considered a libel case since its inception. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm
In an earlier post we noted that on 2 February 2010 the Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in the “fair comment” case of Joseph v Spiller ([2009] EWCA Civ 1075). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:28 am
Supreme Court Chaytor & Ors, R v (Rev 2) [2010] UKSC 52 (01 December 2010) Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53 (01 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullings v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2820 (01 December 2010) Webster v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2819 (01 December 2010) SB, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2620 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) International Management Group (UK) Ltd v German & Anor… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
The Supreme Court’s first libel case, Spiller v Joseph (Case Details here) will be heard on 26 and 27 July 2010. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:04 am
The Supreme Court was required to consider the defence of fair comment in defamation proceedings, in particular the extent to which the factual background giving rise to the comment had to be referred to with the comment itself and be accurately stated. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 pm
Spillers, 2007 UT 13, ¶ 10, 152 P.3d 315 (quoting State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
This requirement makes the reader aware of the subject matter of the comment, without which justification for the defence will be lacking (Joseph v Spiller [2011] 1 AC 852). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crocs Europe BV v Anderson & Anor (t/a Spectrum Agencies) [2012] EWCA Civ 1400 (30 October 2012) McCarrick v Hunter [2012] EWCA Civ 1399 (30 October 2012) Joyce v Epsom and Ewell Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 1398 (30 October 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gregory v Benham [2012] EWHC 2971 (QB) (26 October 2012) Joseph & Ors v Spiller & Anor [2012] EWHC 2958 (QB) (26 October 2012)… [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:05 am
The Supreme Court rejected the first, put forward in Spiller v Joseph ([2010] UKSC 53), which argued for a reform of the law of honest comment in libel so that the defendant’s state of mind would be wholly irrelevant and the test would only depend upon the objective criterion. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Further, we reject claimant's contention that he was denied due process "[a]s the record reflects that [he] was afforded the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner" (Matter of Spillers v Health & Hosp. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Further, we reject claimant's contention that he was denied due process "[a]s the record reflects that [he] was afforded the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner" (Matter of Spillers v Health & Hosp. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 7:11 pm
Responding to a submission filed last week, lawyers for Exxon today asked the Court to declare that the recent decision in Exxon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
