Search for: "Spinelli v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 1:06 pm by Daniel Thies - Guest
For all the complexity of the statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm by Rumpole
Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 914 (1984) (citing Spinelli, 393 U.S. at 419); see United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:45 am by Spring & Spring
  When a police officer seeks a warrant based on information provided by a confidential informant, courts apply the Aguilar-Spinelli test (named for two United States Supreme Court decisions). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm by Brian Shiffrin
  CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeFree With Registration: Prosecutor Improperly Vouched for Witnesses But Evidence of Guilt 'Powerful', Corroborated United States, appellee v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Fall is back, and, in the United States, that means pumpkin-flavored products and (American) football galore. [read post]
24 May 2009, 7:48 pm
The defendant's privacy interests in the Blazer is as the United States Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 8:49 pm by Spring & Spring
When police officers search a suspect based on information provided by a confidential informant, they are required to satisfy the Aguilar–Spinelli test (named for two famous United States Supreme Court cases). [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 8:49 pm by Spring & Spring
When police officers search a suspect based on information provided by a confidential informant, they are required to satisfy the Aguilar–Spinelli test (named for two famous United States Supreme Court cases). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:49 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964); Spinelli v. [read post]