Search for: "Spirit Track v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
A spokeswoman for V&S stated, "The reason for this is that we consider there is a risk of confusion. [read post]
It manages railroad track across the eastern United States, including thousands of miles of track in Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Here, plaintiffs' operative complaint fails to state a claim under the unfairness prong of the UCL because they cannot allege Wells Fargo's alleged dual tracking, when it occurred in 2010, offended a public policy tethered to any underlying constitutional, statutory or regulatory provision. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am by Levin Papantonio
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:06 am
Our readers know we keep track of this sort of decision - even if we don't always get it right 100% of the time.Anyway, by now the case is reported, Curl v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm by Stephen Griffin
  This is fine, but it is not exactly in the spirit of acknowledging what the Court has already stated rather clearly, which is affirmative action must terminate in the near future. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
One of the most spirited issues in this debate is whether the Fourth Amendment requires law enforcement to get a warrant to track a person’s location via their cell phone. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm by Anna Christensen
  Lyle has diligently tracked the progress of the challenge to California’s “Proposition 8” law, Perry v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twelfth day of December in the year two thousand fifteen.BY THE GOVERNORSecretary to the Governors/ [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]