Search for: "Spivak v Spivak" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2013, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
  While my source was correct with respect to Kunin heading up a Reexamination/Reissue division, it is the Oblon Spivak Reexamination/Reissue [...]... [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:56 am
Reporting on the Court of Appeals decision last Friday in the case, In the Matter of the Annexation Proposed by Ordinance No. 2004-11-38, et al v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:00 am by jbyrne
Weiser, Stapler & Spivak, 517 Pa. 522, 539 A.2d 357 (1988); Ammon v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
 By way of example, in Spivak v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Nike - This post reports on Already, LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Garrett Hinck
Russell Spivak summarized the administration’s updated restrictions. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Russell Spivak summarized Moath Hamza Ahmed Al-Alwi's appeal to the D.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This statute is intended “to protect our citizens against the dangers of legal representation and advice given by persons not trained, examined and licensed for such work, whether they be laymen or lawyers from other jurisdictions” (Spivak v Sachs, 16 NY2d 163, 168 [1965]). [read post]