Search for: "Spivak v Spivak"
Results 81 - 91
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm
Last week, this trend continued in the case of Xerox Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
District Court of Connecticut, Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
Russell Spivak delivered a case summary of County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Corp., 283 AD2d 128 [2d Dept 2001]), or “invalid” (Stile v Antico, 272 AD2d 403 [2d Dept 2000]). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
., v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:57 am
These competing rules of law were at play in a recent appeals court decision in a particularly nasty father-son litigation over a donut franchise empire, Burns v C.R.B. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Lawfare contributors Ashley Deeks and Russell Spivak discussed, in 2017, the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
As I noted on Tuesday, Adis Medunjanin was convicted this week in connection with the NYC subway bombing plot. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Liberty is not “I do what I want”; grown up understanding is ordered liberty, reconciling competing claims/rights, and that’s what property/copyright does.Palmer: Rivalrous v. nonrivalrous: good reason to have property, because it avoids conflict over rivalry. [read post]
