Search for: "Sprinkle v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
For example, Judge Fernandez doesn't like the off-the-record assumptions that are sprinkled throughout Judge Kozinski's opinion; e.g., that “[c]onsumers who use the internet for shopping are generally quite sophisticated" or that such people “would arrive at the Tabaris’ site agnostic as to what they would find." [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by Stefanie Levine
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:17 am
Barry also mentions some important historic precedent, like Buck v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am by Ryan Scoville
My impression is that, at least in the United States, it’s common for authors to make representations about custom on the basis of even just a handful of citations to American and British authority and, in the case of the ambitious, a sprinkling of additional references to French and German practice. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
And CAAF currently has only five granted-but-unscheduled cases to sprinkle over those eight dates: United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
On Tuesday, the Court ordered oral argument “in due course” — likely during the current Term — on a key aspect of the nearly four-year-old case of Montana v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
As we enter the courtroom for today’s argument in Christie v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Wilda Wahpepah
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Wilda Wahpepah
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
 For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
These are sometimes problematic terms that have required the attention of the United States Supreme Court in recent years, see Wall v. [read post]