Search for: "Sprinkle v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
   On Tuesday, the Court ordered oral argument “in due course” — likely during the current Term — on a key aspect of the nearly four-year-old case of Montana v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
As we enter the courtroom for today’s argument in Christie v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by Stefanie Levine
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by Stefanie Levine
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
Live state and county results are posted regularly throughout the night. [read post]
11 May 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
If we accept the state's argument, it redefines intermediate scrutiny as a rational basis review with a small sprinkle of skepticism in Second Amendment cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
 For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 7:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Sara Leamon, a criminal defence lawyer in Vancouver, stated in The Georgia Straight, If his tax reform laws are to move forward, many people will suffer. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
 In that respect, the case resembles U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), the case that essentially applied Baker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
None break new ground, though neither concurrence or dissent can resist the politically directed bon mots that are sprinkled in those writings. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Ronald Mann
The first thing we learned this morning with the announcement of the decision in McGirt v. [read post]