Search for: "Stan Gibson" Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Application to File Settlement Agreement under Seal Denied Where Defendant Did Not Show Competitive Harm from Disclosure
5 Jan 2022, 9:26 am by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Meet and Confer Prior to Filing Motion
2 Feb 2021, 5:09 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Motion to Strike Expert on Invalidity Denied Where Development Documents Were Disclosed Sufficiently in Final Invalidity Contentions
18 Feb 2021, 9:06 am by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Denies Ex Parte Motion to Compel Third Party to Produce Documents Where Plaintiff Waited too Long to File Motion
30 Mar 2017, 3:04 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Plaintiff Did Not Have Standing to Pursue Patent Infringement Action Where Inventor Assignment Was Not Automatic
26 May 2021, 12:06 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Vadis v. Amazon: Reasonable Royalty Opinion Excluded Where Entire Market Value Implicated
18 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Expert Testimony Stricken Where Expert Did Not Show Non-Infringing Alternatives Were Available in the United States
19 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Excludes Technical Expert’s Infringement Opinion Based on Sales and Offers to Sell Method Claims as Contrary to Law
31 Oct 2022, 3:54 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Wednesday whimsies
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The 1709 Blog notes, among other things, a procedural nasty that has emanated from the Dataco v Stan James database right dispute: a (wait for it ....) an application by the claimant to re-re-re-re-re-amend their Particulars of Claim. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
District Court Excludes Expert’s Opinion on What He Believed a PTO Examiner Would Have Done Had the Plaintiff Disclosed Additional Information to the PTO as Speculative
26 Sep 2019, 10:27 am by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Granting Security Interest in Patents Did Not Deprive Patent Owner of Standing to Sue for Patent Infringement
30 Jun 2020, 2:58 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Rocksmith Loses its Rock as Interactive Video Game Patent Found Invalid
28 Aug 2019, 11:38 am by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Plaintiff’s Violation of Protective Order Results in $40,000 in Sanctions for Disclosing Confidential Information from U.S. Litigation in a Lawsuit in China
16 Dec 2020, 12:42 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
VirnetX v. Apple: Delay of Five Months Justifies Denial of Motion to Amend Judgment of More Than $400 Million
23 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Awards Attorney’s Fees After Plaintiff Filed Infringement Action Based on Patent Claims That Arose From Patent Family That Previously Had Claims Invalidated
30 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Citrix v. Workspot: District Court Strikes Equitable Defenses Based on Knowingly False Statements
23 Nov 2020, 12:22 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Excludes Royalty Damage Expert for “Conservative” Estimate That Relied upon 50% Apportionment Figure
28 May 2020, 12:46 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Determines That A “Decent Patent Lawyer” Would Have Responded To Requests For Admissions To Preserve Objections Even If Client Was Not Available When Responses Were Due
7 Jul 2022, 2:35 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Court Concludes That Pre-Suit Notice for Willfulness Can Occur Even if Notice Was Provided by Third-Party and Not Patent Owner
10 Oct 2022, 1:52 pm by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
District Court Finds Patents Invalid for Inequitable Conduct Because Inventor Withheld Material Information Of Prior Sales From USPTO And Litigation Misconduct Justified Inference of Non-Disclosure with An Intent to Deceive
18 Oct 2019, 8:44 am by Stan Gibson
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/