Search for: "Standard Oil Co. of California v. California" Results 1 - 20 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2018, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
California has little interest in legislating behavior at such refineries and oil fields. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Shell Oil Company (1970) 2 Cal.3d 245, 248); wholesalers and distributors (Barth v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Abby Adams
Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 764, 771; Rowland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Abby Adams
Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 764, 771; Rowland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Other states are permitted to use either the federal standard or the California standard, but (unlike California) are not allowed to set their own standards that deviate from the federal norm. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:59 pm
Despite the California Supreme Court's conclusion that gasoline purchasers failed even to imply a price-fixing conspiracy among major oil companies, the Ninth Circuit U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The Court noted that early decisions, including Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, the California Supreme Court  adopted the standard set forth in the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in Frye v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:31 am by Sean Wajert
Rptr. 122 (Cal.App. 2d Dist. 1979); Burk Royalty Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:27 pm
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 965, California's seminal case on fear of cancer and medical monitoring costs as damage elements, and the phrase appears there in the dissent. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:02 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
Frank Beckering worked as a machinist for Shell Oil Co. at its facilities in Dominguez and Wilmington in Southern California for nearly four decades, from 1954 to 1992. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 6:43 am
,No. 07-0599Scheduled for oral argument before the Texas Supreme Court on Sep. 11, 2008OPINION BELOW: Republic Drilling Co. v. [read post]