Search for: "Standard Oil Co. of California v. California" Results 41 - 60 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
Last year was the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429, 434), the class action not only benefits the individual litigant but serves the public interest in the enforcement of legal rights and statutory sanctions. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:54 am
Standard Oil Co. of California, 405 U.S. 251 (1972) (holding that Clayton Act does not confer standing for general economic harm), the Court observed that the relevant language of the Connecticut Antitrust Act differed from the Clayton Act. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by David Wagner
Topics will include: Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program Chemicals regulation (possible TSCA reform and California's Green Chemistry) New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Renewable energy incentive programs Offshore wind power generation CERCLA: Fallout from Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U.S. 393 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting) ("[I]n most matters, it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:21 pm by Orin Kerr
Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U.S. 393 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting) ("[I]n most matters, it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]