Search for: "Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Sun Oil Co. (1943), federal courts should abstain from resolving a constitutional challenge to South Carolina's anti-gambling laws. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Because class actions are out of control in California, there are lots more ascertainability cases in Ninth Circuit district courts that we haven't cited. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:45 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
Perhaps the origin of modern exclusive dealing analysis is the Standard Station case of 1949, Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
BACKGROUND: Plaintiff alleges defendant United States Coast Guard violated � 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The origins of forum non conveniens            In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The origins of forum non conveniens            In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
” Then the other 49 states can adopt standards identical to California’s, or none whatsoever. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
California (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 621, 628.), an employer communicating to his or her employees (Dealie v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
The state courts of California, like many states, held that these sorts of contract provisions were unconscionable as applied to class actions. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]