Search for: "Standard Oil Co. v. FTC" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm by Josh Wright
The Statement states that “Congress passed the FTC Act to push back against the judiciary’s open-ended rule of reason for analyzing Sherman Act claims” and cites the Supreme Court’s opinion in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:00 pm
"  The FTC highlighted the Second Circuit's decision in Litton Systems v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
 and Standard Oil Co.), which sought ‘to accommodate patent and antitrust policies, finding challenged terms and conditions unlawful unless patent law policy offset the antitrust law policy strongly favoring competition’. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:15 pm by Steve Davies
Standard Oil Co. of Cal., 449 U.S. 232, 239-243 (1980) (Standard Oil). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:43 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Standard Oil Co. of California, 449 U.S. 232, 243 (1980), the Supreme Court held that the issuance of a complaint under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act was not a final agency action under the APA. [read post]