Search for: "Standard Oil Co. v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
IB further asserted that Dillard, shortly after funding the account, began a trading strategy that consisted of buying and selling mining company stocks and oil and mineral futures. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
In the Curse of Bigness, Wu rejects the consumer-focused account of the Sherman Act articulated in Standard Oil v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Sean Wajert
  Customary international law includes only those standards, rules or customs affecting the relationship between states or between an individual and a foreign state, and used by those states for their common good and/or in dealings inter se. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 pm by Mark Murakami
United States v. $184,505.01 in the United States Currency, 72 F.3d 1160 (3rd Cir. 1995)(original opinion (here)):  this is an asset forfeiture case arising from an in rem proceeding against cash. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 521; the precedent consists of a rule that is judge-made and adopted to improve court operations, not a statute promulgated by Congress, see, e.g., State Oil Co. v. [read post]