Search for: "Standard Parts Co. v. Peck" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Materials subject to more demanding requirements might be eligible for classification as unavailable, or at least not routinely available, for purposes of the exemption 5 standard. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”Teets, 83 F.3d at 407 (citing Dubilier, 289 U.S. at187, and Standard Parts, 264 U.S. at 59–60). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
  While Magistrate Peck has been an active proselytizer for predictive coding, see Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
There is also a hearing in the cases of Hunt v Times Newspapers and Hunt v Evening Standard, before Eady J, concerning costs and the trials of the two actions. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Media Standards Trust director and campaign co-founder Martin Moore argued that the Leveson Inquiry “urgently needs to break open the Motorman files – not least because they might reveal how phone hacking really worked” in a post here. [read post]