Search for: "Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United States"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Miles case, the Court held that resale minimum price fixing was illegal per se under Section 1.[11] It found horizontal price-fixing agreements to be per se illegal in Socony Vacuum.[12] Since Socony Vacuum, the Court has limited the application of per se illegality to bid rigging (a form of horizontal price fixing),[13] horizontal market divisions,[14] tying,[15] and group boycotts[16]. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm
Standard Oil offers us two important takeaways. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Co-director of enforcement Stephanie Avakian touted the Cyber Unit’s second ICO enforcement action, stating: “We will continue to scrutinize the ICO market vigilantly for improper offerings that seek to sell securities to the general public without the required registration or exemption. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Considering the intellectual vacuum the Center had to fill, and the speed with which it had to work, the first edition was a stunning accomplishment. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (1940). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
A number of states that have passed anti price-gouging legislation have recognized the disadvantage of the ambiguous standard and have opted for more specific standards in the form of percentage-caps or no-increase laws. [read post]
