Search for: "Stanford v. Owens" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2008, 7:30 pm
Drown (07-10374), Stanford student David Owens prepared this write-up of the case for SCOTUSwiki. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:26 am
Today the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, along with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell, is filing this cert. petition in Daniels v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:04 pm
Smith/Bryan Cave Lecture & Symposium, entitled, Enforcing Constitutional Rights in the 21st Century: Section 1983 Thirty Years After Owen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 4:58 pm
What follows is Stanford student David Owens’ write-up of oral argument in Haywood v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
  Padilla's merits brief is here; you can also read a discussion of the case by Stanford student David Owens on Scotuswiki here. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:36 am
The brief was produced with the assistance of Stanford students David Owens, Josh Friedman, and Brian Goldman. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:45 am
Stanford student David Owens has previously written on the background and certiorariâ€â [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:12 pm
The brief was written with the assistance of Stanford law students Lisa Ehrlich, Dan Matro, and David Owens. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC, R. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
One way forward for universities after Access Copyright v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
  Anna Christensen of Howe & Russell (along with David Owens of Stanford) previewed the argument yesterday on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:04 am by Kashmir Hill
That suit has dragged out over five years, writes Goldman:[T]he long-running Steinbuch v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:01 pm
David Owens, the Stanford law student who did the write-up, did a thorough job of summarizing the exchanges (the transcipt is available here), but as someone else who was there, I think there is a disconnect between the summary and the analysis that manifests itself in the first and last paragraphs. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
He's been to the highest court — in 2001 he successfully argued a case we're all intimately familiar with, Palazzolo v. [read post]