Search for: "Stanford v. Stewart" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Professor of Law, and Faculty Co-Director, Stanford Criminal Justice Center Justice O’Connor took the seat of Justice Potter Stewart. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Encountering barriers as a young female lawyer In September 1946, then 16-year-old Sandra Day enrolled at Stanford. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In the 19th volume, Jack Rakove, a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian at Stanford, has written “Beyond Belief, Beyond Conscience,” which explores the evolution of religious freedom from the 16th century to the modern era, focusing especially on history, philosophy and political theory. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm by Dan Ernst
Kiechle, Virginia Tech.ICYMI: The NPR podcast "Throughline" has recently released an episode on Milliken v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Several other attorneys had two wins in this category, including Elaine Goldenberg and Malcolm Stewart from OSG. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
Skepticism and assumptions about impactSkepticism about surveillance impacts like chilling effects is, as noted, is persistent with commentators like Stanford Law’s Michael Sklansky insisting there “little empirical support” for chilling effects associated with surveillance or Leslie Kendrick, of UVA Law, labeling the evidence supporting such claims “flimsy” and calling for more systematic research on point. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
One of the paradigm examples of “continuity v. change” in The Innovator’s Dilemma, and the example whose aftermath I’ve witnessed for the last 20 years, is the integrated structural steel industry in the US, headquartered in Pittsburgh. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]