Search for: "Stanford v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The Stanford Center for Internet and Society published a blog in response to the FCC’s announcement that it will vote to restore the net neutrality rules that were removed in 2017 in an agency meeting this April. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
 On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Matt Gluck
  Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  Spirituality, Virtue, and Technology Ethics” "If one loves righteousness, whose works are virtues,She teaches moderation and prudence, righteousness and fortitude, and nothing in life is more useful than these. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am by Anna Salvatore
” Margaret Taylor sat down with Scott R. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Howell also shared a discussion with Alex Stamos, the director of the Stanford Internet Observatory, about electoral disinformation on the Lawfare Podcast. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings In nearly two of every three households in America with dependents, more than one person works to make ends meet. [read post]
Here, Ron Tyler, professor of law and director of Stanford Law’s Criminal Defense Clinic, and Suzanne Luban, clinical supervising attorney and lecturer in law, discuss the Floyd case and offer suggestions for a way forward. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thomas Jefferson’s understanding of the Constitution and republicanism is understood in contrast to John Taylor’s and William Manning’s. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has covered the Department of Justice’s plans to restrict the encryption of communications data. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
Jen Patja Howell shared the latest edition of the "Arbiters of Truth" series from the Lawfare Podcast, in which Quinta Jurecic and Alina Polyakova spoke with Renee DiResta, the technical research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory, about disinformation campaigns and their various different forms: David V. [read post]