Search for: "Stanley v. Georgia" Results 81 - 100 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In Fox v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty [2020] SASC 180 Stanley J considered an application to strike out certain particulars in a defence as being disproportionate and an abuse of the process. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fully litigated prior restraints presumptively unconstitutional—Near v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Ford Motor Co., 190 F.3d 1213, 1216-18 (11th Cir. 1999), is no longer a valid prediction of Georgia law. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 89 S.Ct. 1243, 22 L.Ed.2d 542 (1969) and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:17 am
Today the highly publicized case lands squarely in Georgia's highest court. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:24 am
Bukowski of Stevens & Lee, were just doing their job as they represented Capital Blue Cross in Grider v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Patent Baristas)   Armenia Creative commons license porting process: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia discussing license drafts (Creative Commons)   Canada Canadian Association of University Teachers releases fair dealing advisory (Michael Geist) More on satire and parody and the need for legislation in Canada (Excess Copyright) Canada increases ‘music industry subsidy’ on blank CDs (TorrentFreak)   China Influence of the financial crisis on… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]