Search for: "Stanley v. Stanley"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2021, 1:57 pm
The case, RSUI v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 10:18 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
The First Circuit’s recent decision in Alston v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am
According to petitioner, the disease was caused by the...click to Continue Reading…Correction Officer Receives 60 Days Suspension for Excessive Use of Force - In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard… In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed… [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am
According to petitioner, the disease was caused by the...click to Continue Reading…Correction Officer Receives 60 Days Suspension for Excessive Use of Force - In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard… In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard… In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed the inmate in a chokehold. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Hyman, director of the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; and Philip Sabes, Professor Emeritus in Physiology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:51 am
Zive v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:43 am
Here are the materials in New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court today denied review in Stanley v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:19 pm
See Amarin Pharma v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
Yesterday’s published decision in Hale v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:33 pm
It is the bilingual peer-reviewed legal journal of the Canadian Bar Association.The issue features a number of articles on the R. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[UQ v. [read post]
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PRIVACY CAN BE PROTECTED THROUGH FORENSIC EXAMINATION PROTOCOLS
18 Nov 2020, 7:41 pm
Morgan Stanley & Co. [read post]