Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 3:12 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Starbucks Corporation (*.PDF) “Cuando cosas como esta suceden se abarata el costo del arte y su única fuente de ingresos es su arte”, expresó el abogado de Hayuk al periódico Observer. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by CEDR
So far 2013 has not been a vintage year for “the big corporation”. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:36 am by Joe May
According to the article, 100 other heads of corporations have joined him in that pledge. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
For more than two decades, she’s been a significant voice in front-line and corporate HR management to small businesses as well as Fortune 100 companies. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 5:37 pm by Jeff Sovern
  And here is the abstract: Though few realize it, forced arbitration clauses are endemic in today’s marketplace — hidden in credit card agreements, bank accounts, corporate social media pages, even Starbucks gift cards. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
" Essentially, Starbucks boosted its profits by about 1.6% annually (Starbucks earned more than $672 million on revenue of $9.4 billion during its 2007 fiscal year), by suppressing the wages of its shift supervisors and making up the difference by letting them dip their fingers into the tip jars of the employees who are entitled to the tips, as a matter of mandatory corporate policy. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm by Ram Eachambadi
The EU General Court [official website] on Tuesday reinstated [decision, PDF] a four-year-old trademark infringement complaint filed by Starbucks [corporate website] against a Belgian coffeehouse whose musical-note signage is accused of infringing the iconic mermaid logo. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 10:32 am by Stephen Green
“The actions of the Starbucks corporation are totally unacceptable,” Philadelphia Councilman Kenyatta Johnson told protesters Sunday. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Dumb Starbucks is not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:13 am by Steven G. Pearl
Starbucks Corporation (2/17/11) --- Cal.App.4th ----, 2011 WL 169177, addresses a number of recurring issues in wage cases. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 6:38 am by TANYA MOHN
The notion that corporations can and should do social good is a hot topic of conversation these days, but the concept has a long, if uneven, history. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:00 pm
It explained the law, upheld the law, and actually ENFORCED it by following through all the way until "Copycat" Shanghai Starbuck Ltd. changed its corporate name and took down all signage that created confusion with Starbucks Co. of Seattle Washington. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:57 pm
Starbucks Corp., in which baristas claim that shift supervisors were illegally included in tip pools, and Winans v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by admin
 La Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, mediante Resolución No 15.489 de 2016, protegió la marca notoria STARBUCKS, de STARBUCKS CORPORATION D/B/A STARBUCKS COFFE COMPANY, y negó el registro de la marca mixta STARMARKET STORE solicitada por JUAN CARLOS RUEDA MEJÍA para identificar productos comprendidos en la Clase 32 de la Clasificación Internacional de Niza. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Here are the salient points from what will be—unless Starbucks appeals to the Supreme Court—the last word in the matter [For some previous words, start here -- RDC] Just one of at least 56 marks… Way back in 2005, a bench trial was held in the Southern District to determine whether Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, a New Hampshire corporation doing business as “Black Bear Micro Roastery,” was infringing on some of the more than 56 registered trademarks of… [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:15 am by Tom Smith
And Starbucks has promoted fair trade coffee, marriage equality and racial justice more or less successfully. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:58 am
Even companies like Starbucks who try to facilitate a corporate culture that promotes their employees, requires non-competition agreements with their executives.Aren't we glad the man who started Starbucks wasn't bound by such an agreement? [read post]