Search for: "Starbucks Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
But when Starbucks raises the price of a latte, even modestly,as it did this summer, there is no sense of accomplishment, no sense that the extra change is going anywhere except back into the corporate coffers. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:12 am
Starbucks Corporation (*.PDF) “Cuando cosas como esta suceden se abarata el costo del arte y su única fuente de ingresos es su arte”, expresó el abogado de Hayuk al periódico Observer. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:02 am
New York Times editorial, Are Corporate Tax Cuts Raising Pay? [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Starbucks replied via twitter saying, “Your blog post is very concerning. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:06 pm
Puroast has accused the Starbucks Corporation of adding high levels of potassium to some of its “100% Arabica Coffees” and not disclosing the adulteration to customers. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
So far 2013 has not been a vintage year for “the big corporation”. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:36 am
According to the article, 100 other heads of corporations have joined him in that pledge. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
" Essentially, Starbucks boosted its profits by about 1.6% annually (Starbucks earned more than $672 million on revenue of $9.4 billion during its 2007 fiscal year), by suppressing the wages of its shift supervisors and making up the difference by letting them dip their fingers into the tip jars of the employees who are entitled to the tips, as a matter of mandatory corporate policy. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:44 am
” And plaintiff’s counsel Joel Ard called upon the courts “to use long-established principles of American corporate law to halt, at the wholesale level, corporate America’s ‘woke’ embrace of illegal, racial discrimination. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
“Starbucks swift action to work constructively with the EEOC in this case, not only by compensating the applicant who was turned away, but by committing to additional training for other stores in the El Paso area, sends the right signal from the corporate office,” said EEOC attorney Robert A. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
The EU General Court [official website] on Tuesday reinstated [decision, PDF] a four-year-old trademark infringement complaint filed by Starbucks [corporate website] against a Belgian coffeehouse whose musical-note signage is accused of infringing the iconic mermaid logo. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
A recently-released Starbucks advertisement in the UK has been hailed for its progressive take on gender identity acceptance. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Dumb Starbucks is not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:58 pm
Starbucks Corporation, 2007 Westlaw 1098550 (E.D. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:00 pm
It explained the law, upheld the law, and actually ENFORCED it by following through all the way until "Copycat" Shanghai Starbuck Ltd. changed its corporate name and took down all signage that created confusion with Starbucks Co. of Seattle Washington. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:13 am
Starbucks Corporation (2/17/11) --- Cal.App.4th ----, 2011 WL 169177, addresses a number of recurring issues in wage cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
It’s worth checking out to see the rather intriguing approaches taken by a variety of companies, including Disney, Whole Foods, Starbucks, Amazon and more. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:35 am
It sure looks like a culture problem with the corporation. [read post]
