Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Dumb Starbucks is not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:13 am by Steven G. Pearl
Starbucks Corporation (2/17/11) --- Cal.App.4th ----, 2011 WL 169177, addresses a number of recurring issues in wage cases. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 6:38 am by TANYA MOHN
The notion that corporations can and should do social good is a hot topic of conversation these days, but the concept has a long, if uneven, history. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:00 pm
It explained the law, upheld the law, and actually ENFORCED it by following through all the way until "Copycat" Shanghai Starbuck Ltd. changed its corporate name and took down all signage that created confusion with Starbucks Co. of Seattle Washington. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:57 pm
Starbucks Corp., in which baristas claim that shift supervisors were illegally included in tip pools, and Winans v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by admin
 La Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, mediante Resolución No 15.489 de 2016, protegió la marca notoria STARBUCKS, de STARBUCKS CORPORATION D/B/A STARBUCKS COFFE COMPANY, y negó el registro de la marca mixta STARMARKET STORE solicitada por JUAN CARLOS RUEDA MEJÍA para identificar productos comprendidos en la Clase 32 de la Clasificación Internacional de Niza. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Here are the salient points from what will be—unless Starbucks appeals to the Supreme Court—the last word in the matter [For some previous words, start here -- RDC] Just one of at least 56 marks… Way back in 2005, a bench trial was held in the Southern District to determine whether Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, a New Hampshire corporation doing business as “Black Bear Micro Roastery,” was infringing on some of the more than 56 registered trademarks of… [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:15 am by Tom Smith
And Starbucks has promoted fair trade coffee, marriage equality and racial justice more or less successfully. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:58 am
Even companies like Starbucks who try to facilitate a corporate culture that promotes their employees, requires non-competition agreements with their executives.Aren't we glad the man who started Starbucks wasn't bound by such an agreement? [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 6:25 pm by Michael Webster
Male United States Other Organizations: VP, Franchising and Development, Chief Executive Officer, Project Pie, LLC … [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:17 am by Myanna Dellinger
Last year, Starbucks announced a new corporate-supported educational program that one year later is still viable: Starbucks will reimburse its full-time workers for taking online classes with Arizona State University. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:23 pm
He then went on to attack big corporations like Brad Pitt's character does in the movie. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:00 am by Ellen Yiadom Hoover
Recently, Starbucks decided to take a step in addressing implicit bias by closing its U.S. stores and corporate offices on Tuesday, May 29 for an afternoon of implicit bias training. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 5:51 am by William Carleton
Overall, the panelists -- three of whom work for CoTweet or its parent company, and three of whom engage social media full-time for, respectively, Starbucks, Microsoft and Alaska Airlines -- gave the impression that corporate engagement with consumers on Twitter impacts corporate behavior, and promotes greater transparency. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:19 am by Eric Turkewitz
Sooner or later, this adds up to some real money from out of the pockets of the unsuspecting and into the till of an already multi-billion dollar corporation. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Starbucks Corporation, decided in the Central District of California, answered several important open questions regarding application of the de minimis doctrine. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Pritchett and Ed Tiryakian had the following message for shareholders: Our message to small shareholders of companies like Starbucks, Merck and Target: You can sue when a CEO decides to institute a corporate social-responsibility program that has no benefit to the business. [read post]