Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Here are the salient points from what will be—unless Starbucks appeals to the Supreme Court—the last word in the matter [For some previous words, start here -- RDC] Just one of at least 56 marks… Way back in 2005, a bench trial was held in the Southern District to determine whether Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, a New Hampshire corporation doing business as “Black Bear Micro Roastery,” was infringing on some of the more than 56 registered trademarks of… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:58 am
Even companies like Starbucks who try to facilitate a corporate culture that promotes their employees, requires non-competition agreements with their executives.Aren't we glad the man who started Starbucks wasn't bound by such an agreement? [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 8:04 pm
  This sends the clear message that even huge corporations are not above the law. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:15 am by Tom Smith
And Starbucks has promoted fair trade coffee, marriage equality and racial justice more or less successfully. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In October 2020, Starbucks announced on its corporate website its adoption of a series of policies calculated to realize the company’s “commitment to Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:17 am by Myanna Dellinger
Last year, Starbucks announced a new corporate-supported educational program that one year later is still viable: Starbucks will reimburse its full-time workers for taking online classes with Arizona State University. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:47 am by Joe Consumer
  Sound like complete corporate immunity to me! [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:23 pm
He then went on to attack big corporations like Brad Pitt's character does in the movie. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 11:13 pm
It seems that as Starbucks' stock fell in the market, Supervisors began a new scheme of pooling tips and dividing them amongst the baristas and themselves. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:18 am
Starbucks Corporation An LA Times article covering the case can be read here: Starbucks Wins Reversal of $100 Million Verdict [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Starbucks Corporation, decided in the Central District of California, answered several important open questions regarding application of the de minimis doctrine. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:19 am by Eric Turkewitz
Sooner or later, this adds up to some real money from out of the pockets of the unsuspecting and into the till of an already multi-billion dollar corporation. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:38 pm by Carolyn Elefant
  The Starbucks announcement launched 189,00 news stories – not because free wireless marks the start of a trend but rather because Starbucks came late to the party. [read post]
4 May 2016, 12:41 pm by Anne Tucker
Chobani joined the ranks of high profile stock grants including Whole Foods, Starbucks, Apple and Twitter. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:28 pm by Sona Makker
Author, Angela Eikenberry argues: In the absence of people’s active and effortful moral engagement, corporations and their profit-driven needs set the tone for acceptable ways of being philanthropic. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:16 pm by Sandy
Charbucks would dilute Starbuck's trademark by "blurring" or tarnishment.The decision in Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]