Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 101 - 120 of 545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 2:10 am by Jani Ihalainen
The leading authority is Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New Zealand, where the New Zealand Court of Appeal considered that merely the idea of a TV format is not sufficient to be a dramatic work protected by copyright. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:37 am by Ben
 While this question has received an answer in the affirmative in a number of jurisdictions around the world [this blog recently reported on the latest judgment of the Italian Supreme Court to confirm eligibility for protection of this subject-matter under Italian law], under UK law things have been uncertain for a long time.One of the reasons for such uncertainty is the outcome of the Opportunity Knocks case (Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
 While this question has received an answer in the affirmative in a number of jurisdictions around the world [this blog recently reported on the latest judgment of the Italian Supreme Court to confirm eligibility for protection of this subject-matter under Italian law], under UK law things have been uncertain for a long time.One of the reasons for such uncertainty is the outcome of the Opportunity Knocks case (Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:55 am by John Tierney
 “Artwashing” refers to artists, arts organizations, and their corporate sponsors who, unwittingly or not, rebrand and upscale—i.e. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:29 pm by Anthony Zaller
Starbucks Corporation (this decision is currently under appellate review). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:29 pm by Anthony Zaller
Starbucks Corporation (this decision is currently under appellate review). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Pritchett and Ed Tiryakian had the following message for shareholders: Our message to small shareholders of companies like Starbucks, Merck and Target: You can sue when a CEO decides to institute a corporate social-responsibility program that has no benefit to the business. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:57 pm by Strong Advocates
Under the new policy, corporate employees receive 12 to 16 weeks of paid family leave, but only zero to six weeks are offered to retail employees. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Todd Presnell
  And this phenomenon is not limited to solo practitioners who use the local Starbucks as an office. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Todd Presnell
  And this phenomenon is not limited to solo practitioners who use the local Starbucks as an office. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm by STEPHEN HOLZER
Dunkin’ Brands Inc. oversees a corporation – it doesn’t buy, sell, roast, distribute or even possess coffee. [read post]
If Washington allows for virtual shareholders’ meetings, a company like Starbucks Corporation, which, like Berkshire Hathaway, is noted for its highly produced annual shareholders’ meetings, may continue to hold their meeting in a physical place. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:44 am by Scott H. Kimpel and Candace L. Moss
Companies in a variety of industries have been the target of such proposals, including retailers such as Starbucks. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
AmeriKat Annsley refers to the report written by Martin O’Connor (Addisons) on the recent case of Upaid Systems Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 1514 where the Federal Court of Australia recently grappled with the issue. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:26 am
” Alas, this got Kamali into hot water with a global multinational corporation, and in the name of keeping its brand strong, Starbucks requested he no longer use "Star" and change his logo (which contains a red star). [read post]