Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 101 - 120 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The European Commission has already taken decisions against Ireland (Apple), the Netherlands (Starbucks), Luxembourg (Fiat and Amazon) and Belgium (35 multinationals). [read post]
The European Commission has already taken decisions against Ireland (Apple), the Netherlands (Starbucks), Luxembourg (Fiat and Amazon) and Belgium (35 multinationals). [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm by Ram Eachambadi
The EU General Court [official website] on Tuesday reinstated [decision, PDF] a four-year-old trademark infringement complaint filed by Starbucks [corporate website] against a Belgian coffeehouse whose musical-note signage is accused of infringing the iconic mermaid logo. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm by Chicago Overtime Law Center
The Second Circuit Court recently used this test to determine whether a class of interns was owed compensation for the work they did for Hearst Corporation. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm by Chicago Overtime Law Center
The Second Circuit Court recently used this test to determine whether a class of interns was owed compensation for the work they did for Hearst Corporation. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
In the case Starbucks Corporation vs Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha [2017] SGIPOS 18, Starbucks opposed the registration of a mark by the Japanese dairy company, based on alleged similar layout. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
This was one of the underlying issues that the IP Adjudicator at the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) had to consider in Starbucks Corporation vs Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha [2017] SGIPOS 18, wherein Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, a Japanese dairy company, applied to register the mark , comprising the words “Mt. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am by HRWatchdog
The report cites as an indication of how absurd the California courts have let Proposition 65 litigation get, a lawsuit stayed in 2015 being resurrected in September 2017 as the so-called Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) has sued Starbucks and other coffee sellers over their failure to warn consumers about barely measurable levels of acrylamide in their brews. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 6:38 am by TANYA MOHN
The notion that corporations can and should do social good is a hot topic of conversation these days, but the concept has a long, if uneven, history. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:27 am by Megan Huber-Kovachik
Joe May, corporate social responsibility manager, says the sale “gets bigger and bigger every year. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 2:10 am by Jani Ihalainen
The leading authority is Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New Zealand, where the New Zealand Court of Appeal considered that merely the idea of a TV format is not sufficient to be a dramatic work protected by copyright. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:37 am by Ben
 While this question has received an answer in the affirmative in a number of jurisdictions around the world [this blog recently reported on the latest judgment of the Italian Supreme Court to confirm eligibility for protection of this subject-matter under Italian law], under UK law things have been uncertain for a long time.One of the reasons for such uncertainty is the outcome of the Opportunity Knocks case (Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
 While this question has received an answer in the affirmative in a number of jurisdictions around the world [this blog recently reported on the latest judgment of the Italian Supreme Court to confirm eligibility for protection of this subject-matter under Italian law], under UK law things have been uncertain for a long time.One of the reasons for such uncertainty is the outcome of the Opportunity Knocks case (Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:29 pm by Anthony Zaller
Starbucks Corporation (this decision is currently under appellate review). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:29 pm by Anthony Zaller
Starbucks Corporation (this decision is currently under appellate review). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Pritchett and Ed Tiryakian had the following message for shareholders: Our message to small shareholders of companies like Starbucks, Merck and Target: You can sue when a CEO decides to institute a corporate social-responsibility program that has no benefit to the business. [read post]