Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 161 - 180 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2012, 7:07 am by Steve Kalar
The use of ‘Manager’ in the address sufficiently transforms the addressee from the corporation to a natural person – a Starbucks or McDonald’s manager is a natural person. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Mary Whisner
For instance, in "advanced search," AN/Starbucks retrieves patents assigned to Starbucks. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Protection in the United States of Foreign Trademarks That Are Well Known But Not Used There, 98 TMR 1379 (November - December 2008).Bukhara Grill, NYCAmicus Brief of the International Trademark Association in Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 6:34 am by Nassiri Law
Starbucks Corp., July 26, 2018, Supreme Court of California More Blog Entries: L’Oreal Accused of Wage and Hour Violations, April 5, 2018, L.A. [read post]
1 May 2019, 10:42 am by Daniel Shaviro
Among other things, this point arguably puts a rather low ceiling on the amount of profit that would end up in Starbucks UK operations for corporate income tax purposes, under its existing commercial structure, if arm's length transfer pricing principles were neutrally and "accurately" deployed with respect to its UK PEs. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:00 am by Sam E. Antar
If a corporate executive already has nonpublic knowledge of certain adverse events such as undisclosed weaknesses in internal controls, accounting errors, or an SEC inquiry, a 10b5-1 plan cannot provide a safe harbor again [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:00 am
And from the corporate world we learn that Starbucks is going to harangue us: We now live in an era in which corporate executives have grown convinced that their customers don’t merely want a product or a service, but spiritual and intellectual enlightenment. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Claire Kalia
” In fact, the Court sharply noted that what a large corporation like Starbucks considered de minimis “is not de minimis at all to many ordinary people who work for hourly wages. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 1:13 am
Most of these proposals, however, do not address the fundamental flaws in the international tax regime that allow companies like Apple or Starbucks to legally avoid taxation. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:17 am by Connie Crosby
Starbucks created the coffee shop as a “third place” (after home and the office), and created coffee as a ritual 4. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:30 am
One story that has received a lot of press this week, but that I have not touched, is the $100 million tip pooling judgment received by Starbucks lead employees. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:18 am by Broc Romanek
The proposal was ironic, piggybacking on the Citizens United decision in which the Supreme Court found that corporations have similar political rights to individuals. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:12 am by Paul J. McAndrew, Jr.
     You’ve just bought a new car, or signed an employment agreement, or engaged an investment firm to act for you, or made substantial charges on your credit card, or even just bought a Starbucks card. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:06 am by Jay Causey
     You’ve just bought a new car, or signed an employment agreement, or engaged an investment firm to act for you, or made substantial charges on your credit card, or even just bought a Starbucks card. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:19 am by John Wallbillich
There is so much money sloshing around corporate legal services it’s almost criminal. [read post]