Search for: "Starr v. Price" Results 41 - 49 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Aurora rejected that offer, and an attorney in Hall’slaw office proposed a sale price of $425,000, which would have meant a loss to thelender of about $340,000.It is undisputed that on June 18, 2009, Aurora recorded a notice of default.The notice of default used this (obviously form) language: “The Beneficiary or itsdesignated agent declares that it has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence tocontact the borrower as required by California Civil Code section 2923.5, or the… [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Since the coronavirus outbreak emerged earlier this year, I have been tracking the COVID-19-related securities class action lawsuits and writing about each of the cases as they have come in. [read post]