Search for: "Starr v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
When “Tigers Eat Their Young” – Federal Preemption Of CEQA In Context Of Railroad Projects Will Continue To Present Complex Issues Following U.S. Supreme Court’s Denial of Certiorari In Friends Of Eel River Case
4 May 2018, 12:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  See, Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
New UCL "injury in fact" decision: Hall v. Time Inc.
10 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802 803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
First District Denies Rehearing and Publication Requests, Slightly Modifies Opinion With No Change in Judgment in CEQA Case Upholding U.C. Regents’ EIR for Parnassus Heights Campus Long-Range Development Plan; Petitions For Review Filed
8 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Administrative Record Preparation Costs – Who Pays and When? First District Provides Guidance In Coalition For Adequate Review v. City and County of San Francisco
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Coalition for Adequate Review v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
New Prop. 64 "injury in fact" opinion: Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
18 May 2007, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802-803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
Suppression, State Action and Verizon Wireless
4 May 2011, 5:35 am by Susan Brenner
’ Starr: `mostly’ Starr: `he thought i was kev’ Canady: `U may have to toss yr clothes if they come to question you’ Canady: `Erase yr phone' State v. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Impeachment Proceedings Against U.S. Presidents
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
  Based on Clinton’s conflicting testimony regarding Lewinsky, Starr concluded that Clinton had committed perjury. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
[Josh Blackman] Justice Kavanaugh's Concurrence in Labrador v. Poe
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
King, 567 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Roaming Polansky and the Constitutionality of Qui Tam
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Raich, 545 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Wednesday round-up
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the cert denial in Starr International Co. v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
California Court of Appeal, Munoz v. PL Hotel Group, LLC, Docket No. D078215
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Channel Lumber Co. (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1447, 1450; 2A Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
First District Holds U.C. Berkeley Campus’s Decision To Increase Student Enrollment Above Maximum Projected Level Analyzed In EIR for Long Range Development Plan Is A “Project” Under CEQA And Not Exempt Under Public Resources Code § 21089.09
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[David Post] Are you ready for some football? (Copyright Department)
3 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by David Post
 [There’s another case squarely on point that discredits this idea, too — NBA v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Tuesday round-up
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
First District Reverses Judgment In Controversial “People’s Park” CEQA Case, Holds UC Regents’ Program/Project EIR For Long Range Development Plan And Site-Specific Student Housing Project At The Park Failed To Adequately Analyze Alternative Housing Sites, Noise And Displacement Impacts
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds CEQA Does Not Require City To Predict ESHA Determinations In Approving Project Over Which Coastal Commission Retains Permitting Jurisdiction, And Applies Deferential Standard In Reversing Trial Court’s General Plan Inconsistency Finding
26 May 2015, 10:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Josh Blackman] Chief Justice Roberts's Long, Longer, and Longest Games
25 Aug 2021, 8:27 am by Josh Blackman
Co., 463 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Problems with Filters in the European Commission's Platforms Proposal
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
” That’s the whole problem with them. [read post]
Stanford Center for Internet and Society Blogs - http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog
Recent Law Review Articles -- November 2011
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm by Pace Law School Library
Co. v. [read post]
PEN-e: Pace Environmental Notes - http://paceeenvironmentalnotes.blogspot.com/