Search for: "State v. International Amusements" Results 1 - 20 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2007, 7:42 am by Robert Jacoby
Dahlia Lithwick over at has an amusing piece on the Medellin v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 6:17 pm by Larry
United States, a decision of the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:27 pm by Afro Leo
We are a national state with our own laws. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:07 am by Larry
United States is a classification case from the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:47 am by Larry
Although defendants in customs penalty cases are entitled to a jury trial on whether or not they are liable for a violation, the amount of the penalty is not a question for the jury.So says the Court of International Trade in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:42 pm
Commissioner, 189 F.2d 107 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 877 (1951). and United States ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Larry
This added amusement value to the entire item. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
It then considers the emergence of international standards as they inform regulatory efforts in states and enterprises and as normative standards in their own right. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:02 pm by Clif Burns
So I’m hoping that readers will be equally amused by an export law forfeiture case that is titled United States v. [read post]