Search for: "State v. Mac Sales Co." Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am by Ronald Mann
So, for example, if the MAC for a medication is $100 and the co-pay is $10, the PBM reimburses the pharmacy for $90. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by Emily I. Bridges
Similarly, by analogy to Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:41 am
(Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Secondly, MAC is often expressly stated as an event of default which allows the lessor to call a default and potentially terminate the lease and repossess the aircraft albeit commercially these rights appear to be theoretical in the current circumstances. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
See Statement of Interest of the United States Regarding Proposed Class Settlement in The Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
Recourse loans exist alongside non-recourse loans which, as the name implies, offer the lender no recourse against the borrower beyond foreclosure of the mortgage instrument. [4] Typically, non-recourse loans offer a higher degree of risk, and therefore carry a higher interest rate to match. [5] The banks run the risk that owners will abandon properties which they can no longer afford in a poor state of upkeep, reducing the value of the home, and therefore the amount the bank will receive… [read post]