Search for: "State v. Ryder" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
In January, I blogged that the UK Court of Appeal agreed to hear the case of Tracey v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 12:00 am
 WA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor (Child support: tribunal practice) demonstrates how it should be handled.A Kafkaesque child support decision - The Upper Tribunal sorts out an absurd situation in SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and & Anor (Child support: calculation of income).What exactly are the family courts for? [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
Mubarik [2004] 2 FLR 932, where Ryder J had considered a Hadkinson application, and found as follows:1. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Colasanti and Ryder outsideOakland Circuit Court in MarchWe here at the Law Blogger could not help but notice that same sex couple Frank Colasonti, Jr. and James Ryder were in federal court yesterday before U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Chisholm-Ryder Co. v Sommer & Sommer, 70 AD2d 429,431 [4th Dept 1979] [internal citations omitted].) [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:11 am
In his concurring judgment Mr Justice Ryder agreed (at paragraph 57):"There is a prevalent practice of coining ever more sophisticated phrases which are intended by practitioners to highlight particular aspects of the notion of ‘fairness’. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
However, art 51 limits the CFR’s application to “only when” member states “are implementing Union Law”. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Full story: Local Government Lawyer.Mr Justice Ryder calls for an ‘investigative’ family justice systemDelivering the keynote speech to the ALC Annual Conference on the 16th November, Mr Justice Ryder called for a significant change of culture in the litigation of family disputes. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
EEO/iNews from State CourtsiNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]