Search for: "State v. Whitney" Results 1 - 20 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Philippa Strum, Professor Emerita of the City University of New York and a Senior Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center will be speaking on Speaking Freely: Whitney v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:17 am
Herewith a cross-post from The Cardinal Lawyer celebrating Whitney v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:03 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence  — Merger of influencing witness and obstructing justice Appellant Whitney Dupont appeals from her convictions by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County for influencing a witness, soliciting to influence a witness, and obstruction of justice. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
  Whitney appeals a split-the-baby decision of the district court, granting summary judgment in Whitney's favor on the federal claim, yet remanding the state claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
  Whitney appeals a split-the-baby decision of the district court, granting summary judgment in Whitney's favor on the federal claim, yet remanding the state claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 12:17 pm by Tom Smith
Mitzi the dog is a rescue and was taken in an emaciated state from the streets but is now a fit 4 months old. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:30 am by laborprof lpb
Whitney Cloud, State Pension Deficits, the Recession, and a Modern View of the Contracts Clause, 120 Yale L.J. 2199 (2011). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:06 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1285 (18 November 2010) Whitney v Monster Worldwide Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1312 (18 November 2010) Emerald Supplies Ltd & Anor v British Airways Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1284 (18 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ali v The Crown [2010] EWCA Crim 2665 (18 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Flattery &… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:21 am
The court held that the defendants' limited client roster in the State was not sufficient. [read post]