Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 6,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On June 22, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed in Hiwot Nemariam et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
The Regulations apply to credit institutions (effectively, deposit-taking banks) that are incorporated in one EEA state, but have assets, liabilities or carry on business in another EEA state. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
Dodd-Frank added a provision that says that such a  law is preempted “only if” it “prevents or significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers,” and goes on to specify that courts are to apply “the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank [v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm by Jennifer McGrath
In August, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
I very rarely post about United States Supreme Court cases, on the theory that they already receive a massive amount of attention and don't need much more from me.But I thought I'd make an exception -- albeit a brief one -- for this case. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Robert J. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 3:37 pm by Mark Edwin Burge
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 12:37 pm by Coleman Braun
Following the ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States in Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:20 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Clopton (United States Attorney's Office – Northern District of Illinois) has posted Bowman Lives: The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, the Supreme Court rules "[a] federal statute provides that a court may freeze before trial certain assets belonging to a criminal defendant accused of violations of federal health care or banking laws. [read post]