Search for: "State Bd. of Control v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2013, 2:43 am
Bd. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:38 am
New York Rent Control Bd., 410 N.J.Super. 437, 443 (App.Div.2009). [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
” Lehmann v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in the Tuaua v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in the Tuaua v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in the Tuaua v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
State Bd. of Med. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Bd. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
Bd. (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 764 (“POET II”), a biofuels manufacturer challenged the LCFS, but the superior court dismissed all of the case’s claims as moot in light of earlier related litigation. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:43 pm
Indeed, the propriety of a venue choice was at the heart of a recent case before the Georgia Court of Appeals, Bd. of Regents v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Appeals Bd. (2023) __Cal. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:05 pm
Nick sought to overturn the city’s decision by seeking a writ of administrative mandamus, but the superior court denied Nick’s writ petition and the Appeals court affirmed that decision in Nick v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
Bd. of Edn. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Following a stay and abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:25 am
Superior Court (2017) 9 Cal. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
States, SE & SW Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
