Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 5:40 am by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: This posting appears on the RLUIPA Defense Blog and is reprinted with permission: https://www.rluipa-defense.com/2016/03/new-jersey-district-court-remands-rluipa-and-equal-protection-defense-to-state-court/ The Freedom From Religion Foundation sued the Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders, the Morris County Preservation Trust Fund Review Board, and Joseph A. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:21 pm
The California State Board of Equalization (BOE or SBE) was handed a defeat by the California Appellate Court in Dell Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
In July, California Secretary of State Shirley Weber filed a petition for a writ of supersedeas in the California Court of Appeal with respect to the trial court's judgment in Crest v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
  You may recall that, earlier this year, two Los Angeles Superior Courts struck down as unconstitutional two California laws mandating that boards of public companies achieve specified levels of board diversity and enjoined implementation and enforcement of the legislation. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
  You may recall that, earlier this year, two Los Angeles Superior Courts struck down as unconstitutional two California laws mandating that boards of public companies achieve specified levels of board diversity and enjoined implementation and enforcement of the legislation. [read post]
A California Superior Court judge has invalidated state legislation that required boards of publicly held corporations headquartered in California to include a minimum number of directors from underrepresented communities. [read post]
Padilla, California Superior Court Judge Terry Green granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs who had challenged AB 979, one of California’s two board diversity statutes, as violating the California Constitution. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
Padilla, in which the Los Angeles County Superior Court held that California’s statute requiring women on corporate boards violates the state constitution’s equal protection clause. [read post]
Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
”[14] On May 13, 2022, Judge Duffy-Lewis—also of the Los Angeles Superior Court—reached a similar conclusion in a second action also titled Crest v. [read post]