Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
For example, it is inappropriate to ignore negotiated reductions to the final price.[25] But the contractor must establish that the negotiated reduction related to the same cost element as the undisclosed data.[26] The proposed price also is not the appropriate baseline where there have been material changes, such as new quantities or delivery schedules.[27] Additionally, the proposal price is not the appropriate baseline where there is evidence the Government relied on another analysis or… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:58 am
Thus, it should have been a surprise to no one when Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis after a trial held that SB 826 violated the Equal Protection clause of the California Constitution (A person may not be . . . denied equal protection of the law"). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
  You may recall that, earlier this year, two Los Angeles Superior Courts struck down as unconstitutional two California laws mandating that boards of public companies achieve specified levels of board diversity and enjoined implementation and enforcement of the legislation. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
  You may recall that, earlier this year, two Los Angeles Superior Courts struck down as unconstitutional two California laws mandating that boards of public companies achieve specified levels of board diversity and enjoined implementation and enforcement of the legislation. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
In July, California Secretary of State Shirley Weber filed a petition for a writ of supersedeas in the California Court of Appeal with respect to the trial court's judgment in Crest v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Superior Court had already determined Bill 5’s constitutionality. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Last month, the California Secretary of State appealed the decision by a California Superior Court striking down as unconstitutional California’s board diversity law, which required all publicly traded companies headquartered in the State to include a minimum number of female directors. [read post]
”[14] On May 13, 2022, Judge Duffy-Lewis—also of the Los Angeles Superior Court—reached a similar conclusion in a second action also titled Crest v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
That all changed with the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Like other digital providers, it is not bound by the Communications Act of 1934, a law that requires broadcast television networks to provide politicians equal access to the airwaves. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]