Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
What is especially interesting about the court case, Associated Irritated Residents v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State to which the application is made, or its courts, shall decide whether the act is of a political character. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm by Raj Chohan
What about — we are looking at the effect on this particular person and we are deciding whether it shocks the conscience or whatever their across-the-board State standard is. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
At issue in the case is whether Michigan's affirmative action ban falls afoul of the slippery equal protection doctrine of Hunter v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 12:47 pm by Lynn Kirwin
In Montgomery v Kenwell, a 2017 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Barrie, Ontario, the wife was awarded $75,000. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
The suit was dismissed by the Maricopa County Superior Court and the Colemans appealed. [read post]