Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2018, 11:19 pm
Superior Court (1988) 45 Cal.3d 491, in which the California Supreme Court concluded that implementation of special legislation concerning transportation facility funding in Orange was reserved exclusively to city councils and board of supervisors, not the voters. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:35 pm
Lastly, as to the Due Process claim, because the Church failed to allege that constitutionally adequate state law remedies, such as an ordinary zoning appeal of the Board’s decision to the New Hampshire Superior Court, were unavailable, the court held that the Town was entitled to summary judgment on the Church’s due process claim. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am
The Court of Appeal, following the reasoning of The Highway 68 Coalition v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
In 2009, the plaintiffs filed an action against the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County which was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice three years later in light of the Supreme Court's decision in "Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Supreme Court embraced in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
To these Supreme Court cases, we append the more recent Superior Court case of Makripodis v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 545; Guthrey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
Court and OSC Review In coming to its conclusion, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice cited the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (BCE) for the proposition that three conditions must be satisfied by a corporation seeking an arrangement: that statutory procedures have been met; that the application has been put forward in good faith; and that the arrangement is fair and reasonable. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:32 am
The case itself--Solas OLED v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
Just like the Supreme Court did in 1997 in Reno v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Board of Trustees, 489 U.S. 468, 479 (1989). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In August last year, the Kerala High Court [Venu v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
A jury trial was held in Alamance County Superior Court on 3 February 2014. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ("Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 12:47 pm
In Montgomery v Kenwell, a 2017 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Barrie, Ontario, the wife was awarded $75,000. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:58 am
The California Supreme Court in LeBouef v. [read post]
