Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2025, 10:48 am
The suit, Doe 1 et. al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 3:11 pm
In United States Postal Service v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
Conference v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 11:00 am
The Buzbee Law Firm et al., case number 24SMCV05637, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 7:10 pm
Since then, Duncan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:06 am
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., the Court of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, reversed a $2 million-plus judgment against PG&E. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:23 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 12:15 am
Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 355, 377, 68 Cal.Rptr.3d 656.) [read post]
23 Mar 2025, 2:09 pm
(California Court of Appeal, Dec. 17, 2024, Yaffee v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 4:30 pm
Lemme Inc., were filed in in California Superior Court and the Southern District of New York on February 19 and March 9, respectively. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arguably the most important piece of law enacted anywhere in the world over the last two centuries, opens majestically with these words: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 7:00 am
Superior Court (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 351, 363.) [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 5:36 am
Claybrooks v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:46 am
Superior Court (1983). [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 10:37 am
The Casey decision comes four months after the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Liu v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 2:09 pm
Superior Court, a case brought by two legal aid organizations challenging the statutory recording ban. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:13 am
”[xiv] The Superior Court agreed with Zurich. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
At the pleading stage, the Court assumed California law would apply, because neither side suggested that any other state's law would apply. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 11:49 am
The superior court found that Facebook violated this law and awarded $35M in penalties and attorneys’ fees as well as an injunction. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 7:15 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
