Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 4,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 12:25 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The California Supreme Court gave the state’s employers a huge victory when it issued its ruling in Brinker v. [read post]
As we wrote here, in January 2020, state court Judge William Highberger issued a decision holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) preempts use of California’s version of the “ABC” test (as adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Hatch argues, among other points, that a decision of the United States Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:50 am by Douglas A. Plazak
Superior Court – Corporate Person Most Qualified / Knowledgeable Depositions appeared first on California Litigation Attorney Blog. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:15 am
A little over a year ago, I wrote that California Superior Court Judge Terry Green had found that AB 979 facially violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution,  Cal. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:21 pm
The California State Board of Equalization (BOE or SBE) was handed a defeat by the California Appellate Court in Dell Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Oct. 12, 2016), the defendants sought a nine-month stay of litigation under Code of Civil Procedure sections 595 and 1054.1, which provide for mandatory continuances of court proceedings if a party is represented by an attorney who is also a member of the California State Assembly -- unless the continuance "would defeat or abridge the other party's right to provisional or pendente lite relief. [read post]