Search for: "State Election Bd. v. Bayh"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
Instead, Stanford argues that the rights in the invention vested in it, because by following the election provisions of Bayh-Dole, it had elected to "retain title" to the invention. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
Instead, Stanford argues that the rights in the invention vested in it, because by following the election provisions of Bayh-Dole, it had elected to "retain title" to the invention. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 10:13 pm
Bd. of Trs. v. [read post]
