Search for: "State Ex Rel. Hart v. District Court"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
See Hart v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
June 13, 2007); Henik ex rel. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Supp. 1471 , 1479 (D.R.I. 1984); Regents of the Univ. of Colo. ex rel . [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Supp. 1471 , 1479 (D.R.I. 1984); Regents of the Univ. of Colo. ex rel . [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The district court granted summary judgment against the EEOC on the merits. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The County Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and may act only as provided by the New York Constitution or by act of the Legislature within the limitations of the Constitution (see NY Const, art VI, § 11; Judiciary Law § 190; Matter of Russell v Clute, 222 AD2d 980 [3d Dept 1995]; People ex rel. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
In its conclusions, the trial court stated that the Trust's "Business Records Affidavit, and the documents and records attached thereto, were properly admitted into the evidentiary record at trial. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(North Carolina ex rel. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:21 pm
See Molina ex rel. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
Here, unlike in many of the cases involving exotic dancers, see, e.g., Hart v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
See Mitts, supra; Hart v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation in the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Miss United States of America, LLC. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
