Search for: "State Ex Rel. Smith v. Smith"
Results 121 - 140
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
As depicted in the chart below, Appellant also offers citations that have potentially real case names – presumably the product of algorithmic serendipity – but do not stand for the propositions asserted by Appellant, such as State ex rel. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm
Smith, No. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Full disclosure: David is a Reed Smith case, so this entry is also non-RS.Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
The impact of a Patentee’s participation in the pilot program was recently considered in Brass Smith LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:51 am
Medline, a non-intervened case resulting in $85 million settlement arising from unlawful kickbacks paid to providers to induce government purchases of medical supplies; United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Summaries of government, administrative and related law decisions posted by Justia People ex rel. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Further, atomoxetine is effective at relatively low doses, as discussed below, and may safely and effectively be administered once a day. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
"The decision is set out below:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:48 am
” McLauchlan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
New Mexico, ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:33 am
SeeColorado Constitution, Article II, § 23 (“The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate in criminal cases…”); see also Garhart ex rel. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
See Nuxoll ex rel. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
We would like to thank Reed Smith’s Kevin Hara for helping to put this together.Daimler AG v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
