Search for: "State Farm v. INSURANCE DEPT."
Results 81 - 100
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 2:06 pm
In addition, the denial was not conclusory or vague, and did not otherwise involve a defense which had no merit as a matter of law (see Nyack Hosp. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:10 am
Co. v Kopsky, 137 AD2d 804; Anzalone v State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:43 am
Home Care v New York State Dept. of Health, 5 NY3d at 506). [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 9:07 pm
State Farm (PDF), S. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
State Farm Ins. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
Co. (4th Dept., decided 7/10/2009) The motion court's rulings against the CGL insurer went 0-3 on this appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
(Frenkel) (3rd Dept., decided 1/29/2009) The New York Court of Appeals' April 2005 decision in Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:40 am
& State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals has interpreted 11 NYCRR 65-3.16(a)(12) to allow insurance carriers to withhold reimbursement for no-fault claims from fraudulently licensed medical corporations and to "look beyond the face of licensing documents to identify willful and material failure to abide by state and local law" (State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:54 am
Co., 26 AD3d 355, 356; Centrone v Staste Farm Fire & Cas., 275 AD2d 728). [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:34 am
Dawson Farms v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:18 am
(see State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
Plaintiff maintains that this Court must follow SZ Medical P.C. v State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
* * * * * "An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of State Farm Mut. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
There was no question as to liability for the crash and the other driver’s insurance carrier, State Farm, paid its $25,000 policy limits to settle Mr. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
The Superintendent's interpretation is entitled to deference, since it is neither irrational nor unreasonable, nor counter to the clear wording of a statutory provision (see LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
