Search for: "State Of New York et al v. Scalia" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Natalma M. McKnew
That triggered an action in the Southern District of New York, State of New York et al v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Marty Lederman
  As the Court wrote in Gregory and in Bond (and in New York v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Supreme Court treats a case that already has a docket number with the Court, Phillip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
United States and Black, et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. next Monday in Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
”) The study got extensive coverage in various places, including in the New York Times. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:22 am by Lyle Denniston
” A lawyer for the six suing states, New York’s state Solicitor General Barbara D. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
  To support the proposition that "accompany" can mean a short distance, and could in the 30s when the statute was written, Justice Scalia cites a 1930 wedding announcement in the New York Times saying "accompany to the altar. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:46 am
The Sentencing Law Blog also reports on the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Barber, et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]