Search for: "State Of New York et al v. Scalia" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 11:31 am
" Now, the New York Law Journal reported April 22, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of consumers. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm by JB
S. 528, 572 (1985) (Powell, J., dissenting); New York v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm by Natalma M. McKnew
Several state Attorneys General challenged the new regulation in New York et al v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First up will be the ACA's defenders, the intervenor states (California, et al.) and the House of Representatives, followed by the Solicitor General and the plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm by My name
Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922); Penn Central Transportation Co, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:27 am by My name
Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922); Penn Central Transportation Co, et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Thus the outcome of any church-parish dispute over property will continue to turn upon the State in which it arises: if the parish is in California, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York or Ohio, it will most likely lose its property; but if it is in Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire or South Carolina, it will most likely keep its property. [read post]